Notwithstanding shortage of consensus in the technical community openly connecting talcum powder with the danger of ovarian cancer, estimators have sided with accusers rather than J&J in two out of six talcum powder claims that have left to trial. To get more info on talcum powder ovarian cancer click right over here.
Though the accusers have presented studies dating back to the 1960s which reveal a connection between ovarian cancer and talc, J & J has in its store research demonstrating that it is little if any connection.
At the same time, plaintiffs from the Fox lawsuit, which led to a $72 million settlement, mentioned internal memos suggesting that J&J officials were conscious of decades of study but decided not to warn customers, instead of picking gain over people’s lives.
Attorneys introduced as proof a 1997 memo by a J&J medical advisor who stated that “anyone who denies [the] dangers” involving “sterile” talc use and ovarian cancer could be perceived in precisely the exact same light as those that denied a connection between smoking cigarettes and cancer”
And talcum powder is nowhere near the first product J&J has defended: a long run of the lawsuit, from Motrin to cool implants to get lenses have over tarnished its reputation.
The giant health-care firm has paid out a few billion dollars in civil settlements and criminal penalties, and it is shelling out tens of thousands of dollars to settle on talcum powder suits.